Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Tracy

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8
Tournaments / Re: 2015 Ice Bowl
« on: January 08, 2015, 08:44:36 AM »
Also, I signed up for pm round at Rosie on the 24th. If I wanna play am round first and then pm round as I signed up for, I assume I can just show up in the am and pay the $10? And purchase more mullies if I want?

Yes, "first" round actually means any non-final 9 round.

USM / Re: USM Ace Fund League - 2014
« on: August 08, 2014, 08:44:04 AM »

WYCO / 8-1-14 League results
« on: August 06, 2014, 10:29:37 AM »
I ran league in Mark's stead. Don't know what the Ace fund is up to guess was something north of $400.  No one hit it, so it increased by $5 this day.

Place  NameScorePaid
1Beckett Carduff   54$10
2Tracy Walker61$5
3Brandon Forbes67
4Phil Brice68
5Kevin Pike71

Come out this Friday, 8/8.

WYCO / League 7-25-14
« on: July 25, 2014, 09:18:40 AM »
Wyco received a fresh mow yesterday, July 24th.

WYCO / Re: Wyco is closing?
« on: July 24, 2014, 04:42:46 PM »
This should put to rest any lingering concerns that Wyco is going to be removed for soccer fields.

General Banter / Re: AM Worlds Query.....and possibly Pro.....
« on: July 21, 2014, 01:54:52 PM »
Not sure what you're looking at, Tallguy?  This years worlds events combined have over a 1000 players.  age protected lists look robust on both am and pro sides.

WYCO / Re: 6-27-14 League Cancelled
« on: June 28, 2014, 03:07:34 PM »!foam-glow-5k---kansas-city/c1br1

Can I get some Wyco clarrification on these:

7: Far beyond OB is the same line as 9 left side OB? Yes

9: There is OB beyond (inbetween basket and road) making it tighter than the road itself? It will be as in the caddy book; at the road. I'll be correcting it today.

12: Does the OB line for left side of 13 come into play? Yes

17: Does the OB line for right side of 9 come into play for right side of 17? Yes


I have a question about #9 at Wyco.  Caddy book shows the OB on left and right goes all the way to the road (straight ahead).  I just played there and it's painted OB short of the road.  It cuts in front of the the pin that is  straight ahead.  So is the caddy book wrong?  I get the OB on the left and right.  I don't understand it straight ahead when you have the road there.     

The caddy book shows the way I described to Dick several weeks ago how I would lay it out.  However, I forgot what I told him and laid it out in the slightly less forgiving formation as is painted. Dick has told me to fix it to match the caddy book.  It shall be done.

Rosedale / Re: Hole #1 looks beautiful!
« on: June 15, 2014, 02:47:13 PM »
The only one I know involved for certain was Tink, he said he helped spread mulch but lotsa love to whoever put in the 4x4's and rebar.

John Park did the 4x4 work. At 60 something, he's been a strong work horse at Wyco too.  If you see the guy on a course doing work, shake his hand and tell him you appreciate what he's doing for our courses.

Tournaments / Re: 2014 Team Challenge
« on: June 08, 2014, 07:40:12 PM »
Thank you to those that came out to watch and to all the participants that supported this years event.  We raised $370 toward the KCFDC Tree Love Fund.  :)

Results of Round 3 - Singles

1 - (W) Lee Killianover(E) Eric Eastwood1up
2 - (W) Justin Atwater-Taylor  over(E) Jose Ossa2&1
3 - (E) Steve Dresserover(W) Frank Weaver5&3
4 - (W) Bobby Villarrealover(E) David Valdiviez4&3
5 - (W) Tom Butlerover(E) Tony Burnett4&3
6 - (W) Steve Thimmeschover(E) Jacob Hinck8&7
7 - (E) Matt Croweover(W) Beckett Carduff2&1
8 - (E) Ken Franksover(W) Dick Parker2&1
9 - (W) Jon Thomasover(E) Zeke Henry4&3
10 - (E) Jake Bowenover(W) Joe Hesting3&2
11 - (E) Matt Perryover(W) Mark Albers6&5
12 - (W) Bryan Guthrieover(E) CD Steiner1up
13 - (E) Tyler Mattoonover(W) Jeff Campbell3&1
14 - (W) Peter Buresvs(E) Kevin ManningA/S
15 - (E) Adam Johnsonover(W) Kevin Zane4&2
16 - (W) Arturo Villarrealover(E) Mike Thomas1up
      Final Score
    West - 18 over East 14

West Side, Captained by Joe Hesting, wins the 2014 Kansas City Team Challenge!

Tournaments / Re: 2014 Team Challenge
« on: June 08, 2014, 07:16:35 PM »
Results of Round 2 - Best Shot Doubles

1 - (E) Matt P. / Adam J over(W) Mark A. / Steve T.4&3
2 - (E) Mike T. / Jamie B.over(W) Frank  W. / Tom B.2&1
3 - (W) Beckett C. / Justin A-T.over(E) Jacob H. Matt C.2&1
4 - (W) Dick P. / Bobby V.over(E) Steve D. / Dave V.1up
5 - (W) Arturo V. / Kevine Z.over(E) Billy N. Zeke H.5&4
6 - (E) CD / Tony B.over(W) Lee K. / Bryan G.4&3
7 - (W) Joe H. / Peter B.over(E) Ken F. / Eric E.2&1
8 - (E) Jose O. / Jake B.over(W) Jon T. / Mike D.3&2
Score after 2 rounds
    West - 9.5 vs East 6.5

Tournaments / Re: 2014 Team Challenge
« on: June 07, 2014, 03:22:32 PM »
Results of Round 1 - Alternate Shot Doubles

1 - (W) Bryan G. / Justin A-T. over(E) Mike T. / Jamie B.2&1
2 - (W) Dick P. / Tom B.over(E) Kevin M. / Zeke H.1up
3 - (W) Beckett C. / Mike D.over(E) Matt P. / Billy N.3&2
4 - (E) Dave V. / Steve D.over(W) Lee K. / Nick A.2&1
5 - (W) Jon T. / Steve T.over(E) Scott M. / Matt C.1 up
6 - (E) Tyler M. / Jacob H.vs(W) Jeff C. / Mark A.A/S
7 - (E) Jose O. / Jake B.over(W) Arturo V. / Frank W.  5&4
8 - (W) Joe H. / Kevin Z.over(E) CD / Tony B.3&2
West - 5.5 vs East 2.5

Second Round, Best Shot Doubles, rolling start begins at 10:00am from hole 1 at Lakeside Hills, Olathe.  Players, please be there by 9:20-9:30am. Captains will begin match-up selection draft at 9:40am.

3rd round, Singles, will begin about 1 hour after the last 2nd round match is complete.

Tournaments / Re: 2014 Team Challenge
« on: May 18, 2014, 09:38:14 PM »
For the record, from a personal message I sent to both Dick and Jose in early March, here is the exact question to Jose's answer:

3) Do you want to discuss any major changes to the format?  The event is still young and finding its way.  I would like to suggest dropping the class restrictions; that is, all player spots are Open, no Masters age or Women required (though you can carry them if you wish).  I suggest this because, a) we have plenty of very good masters age players that will make each team by default.  b) the women's interest in this event has been sadly low.

3.  I am for non-divisional play.  All open.

I don't see any thing in my question that made it unclear about my intention to remove the women's division requirement.

Tournaments / Re: 2014 Team Challenge
« on: May 18, 2014, 09:10:06 PM »
The allegiance amendment proposal has been dropped. You must live on the side you play for.

This is a fundraising event with each participants $10 donation going towards course tree planting projects.

Each team will field 16-20 players.  It is an Open, or if that term is somehow confusing, an unrestricted, event now.  There are no classification requirements or restrictions. Everyone keeps saying "keep it simple."  This is as simple as it gets and was decided upon months ago.

There are but a handful of competitive women disc golfers in the area.  Forcing women representation on each team at 10-12.5% of the team is terribly disproportionate to the actual population of competitive players in the KC area.  I hope someday, the women's competitive disc golf population becomes as vibrant as the men's is.  When that happens, perhaps a women's Team Challenge can be organized. I do truly hope so because the women disc golfers around here are all amazing people.

Now for the real account of what happened:
As I posted months ago in this thread, it was all along my plan to eventually make this event player unrestricted, including not having a women requirement.  I felt that this year was as good as any to make that change. I first spoke with Dick about the change. He initially said he wanted to keep the women specifically. After some convincing on the phone, I got him to agree with whatever East side would agree to.  I think he figured East side would not agree to a pure unrestricted format.  I then communicated with Jose that I wanted to change the event to an all open format.  And he agreed to it. I specifically stated that this also meant no women required. Jose was ok with that; agreeing with me that it was right to have the best on each side playing, not restricted by classification.. I was actually quite surprised, but also glad he approved the change to unrestricted play, because that is what I envisioned all along. Jose, you had the opportunity to disapprove of this then, but did not. To support the fact that what I just stated is what was agreed upon, consider the following: We proceeded with qualifiers, this year, without a requirement for women because that was the change that was enacted.  Otherwise, I would have made sure the captains had at least one woman make each team via qualifier as we had done in the past.

The change to an unrestricted format for the Team Challenge was finalized months ago. Qualifiers were held in accordance with the agreed upon change.  That's it. That simple. That said, either team may carry anyone they want to fill their roster.  There are no longer any classification requirements for the KCFDC Team Challenge. If a side wants to bring more or less masters than the other side, they are welcome to. If a side wants to bring more or less women than the other side, they are welcome to, same for juniors, legends, toddlers.  whatever, it's UNRESTRICTED.  Go Team Challenge!

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8