General > Tournaments

2013 Kansas City Team Challenge - June 1-2, 2013

<< < (8/75) > >>

eeastwood:
I would recommend that you have named alternates in case someone doesn't show up.  Another suggestion, would be to consider increasing the number of participants, maybe 18 per team.     

jack:
EAST SIDE!

The WEST side is so worried about their team, that they are mapping it already!  I don't blame them, they got beat worse than a red headed step child at the Ice Bowl by a World Champ!

:-p

EEEEEEAAAST siDE!!!

Tom:

--- Quote from: jack on February 01, 2013, 01:55:32 PM ---EAST SIDE!

The WEST side is so worried about their team, that they are mapping it already!  I don't blame them, they got beat worse than a red headed step child at the Ice Bowl by a World Champ!

:-p

EEEEEEAAAST siDE!!!

--- End quote ---

Why not just a straight up multi day tourney and take the total scores from both teams and the low number wins? Keeping it simple makes sense, and would more clearly identify the stronger team. (West)

jack:
I don't care that much, just couldn't resist the EAST SIDE dominance! 

Tracy, I agree entirely with your thoughts on this, and appreciate the efforts.  I only hope to be able to help the East Side again this year, and hopefully not injure myself to give Loomis a false feeling of hope! :P

hberciunas:
no requirements for a "grand master"?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version